> My plan is to just enable AAAA records for "2.pool.ntp.org" (and > 2.fedora.pool.ntp.org etc) and see how that goes. Depending on the > outcome, we can make a "ipv6.pool.ntp.org" IPv6-enabled or IPv6-only > pool.
For the use case I envision (production-style support for v6-only hosts), it doesn't really matter whether ipv6.pool is IPv6-enabled or IPv6-only - the v6-only hosts would go only after AAAA records, anyway. It's just that I dislike the beta. label that you proposed at some point as it indicates that it's *not* production-level. I don't mind having *also* beta.pool.ntp.org, which would have the vision of becoming the standard pool at some day - but then I'd like to see some a-priori criterion as to when this beta installation would take over the production installation (after one year? when there are more than N servers in each region? ...) Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
