> I realise this is a very small and insignificant error, well within the > tolerance of the pool system, but it does look a bit odd. Has something > happened to the clock on the monitoring system?
It seems far more likely to be a change in asymmetry in network connections. I look at most of the monitoring graphs and what I personally see, is variances in network performance, not variances in native clock accuracy. Others chalk it up differently. But I would never ascribe anything to native Clock performance unless I saw it relative to a very good PPS refclock. I say That having stuck my fingers into a number of the refclocks at the few microsecond level over the years. True time-nuts will mock me because I wasn't working at the nanosecond level! Tim. _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
