>> Opinions differ on how `legitimate' such traffic is. My own stance >> is that anyone doing NAT has earned any resulting brokenness by >> deliberately corrupting packets in transit. > If you are saying that normal NTP time queries should be forbidden to > those behind NAT routers, you are stopping about 99% of those I know > who are using NTP from doing so. I hope this was not your intention, > or that I have somehow otherwise mis-understood.
No, not that they should be prevented. Just that if it _doesn't_ work, it's their own fault - that is, when I see "this works without NAT and breaks with NAT", my reaction is much more "don't do that, then" than "the peer should be fixed". /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
