"Wei, Catherine" writes:
> Hi, Harlan:
>   This problem has been resolved. It's still the KoD that caused it.

That's just a warning message.

>   This command "sntp -d -S -K /dev/null 10.204.134.250" works since
>   the "-K /dev/null" disables the KoD storage.

The -d should not be needed.

What is the return status of the sntp command?  If it's 0, it thinks
it set the time.  If it's 1, there was a problem.

If there was a problem, sntp should have written something to the
syslog.  Is there anything interesting there?

H
--

>   Thank you still the same.
> 
> Best regards,
> Catherine
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pool [mailto:[email protected]] On=
>  Behalf Of Wei, Catherine
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 12:53 PM
> To: Harlan Stenn <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pool] problem about sntp
> 
> Hi, Harlan:
>     I've also tried "sntp -d -S 10.204.134.250" on the embedded system, and=
>  got the following result:
> "sntp [email protected] Thu Feb 16 09:54:19 UTC 2017 (1) No ipv6 support avail=
> able, forcing ipv4
> kod_init_kod_db(): Cannot open KoD db file /var/db/ntp-kod: No such file or=
>  directory
> handle_lookup(10.204.134.250,0x2)
> move_fd: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16 sntp =
> sendpkt: Sending packet to 10.204.134.250:123 ...
> Packet sent.
> sock_cb: 10.204.134.250 10.204.134.250:123
> 1970-01-01 19:25:26.407448 (-0100) +1487240461.716791 +/- 991493641.281683 =
> 10.204.134.250 s3 no-leap"
> 
> The sntp version is 4.2.8p8.
> After a while, the date is still not synced.
> By the way, when I set my own pc's date to an incorrect date, then use the =
> "/usr/sbin/sntp -s -l /tmp/sntp.log 10.204.134.250", the time is synced to =
> the right time very quickly.
> 
> I used sntp because this is early requirement from customers, ntpd, ntpdate=
>   also used and these are alternative, we need to make sure all of them wor=
> k.
> 
> Thanks
> Best regards,
> Catherine
>    =20
> ________________________________________
> From: Harlan Stenn <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 12:07 PM
> To: Wei, Catherine
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pool] problem about sntp
> 
> "Wei, Catherine" writes:
> > Hello:
> >
> >     I met an sntp sync time problem. Not sure if it's related to the=20
> > upgrade of ntp. I logged on to a linux embedded box as root, and the=20
> > time is
> >
> > "Thu Jan  1 16:10:15 CET 1970"
> >
> >
> > Then I used sntp command:
> >
> > "/usr/sbin/sntp -l /tmp/sntp.log -t 10 10.204.134.250 -s"
> >
> >
> > I got the following result:
> >
> > "
> >
> > sntp [email protected] Thu Feb 16 09:54:19 UTC 2017 (1)
> > kod_init_kod_db(): Cannot open KoD db file /var/db/ntp-kod: No such=20
> > file or d irectory
> > 1970-01-01 16:04:55.269888 (-0100) +1487240461.813365 +/-=20
> > 991493641.349652 10
> > .204.134.250 s3 no-leap?
> >
> > "
> >
> >
> > Considering the warning in the second line, I did some research and it=20
> > was ju st a file used for the persistent history of KoD??, it just types =
> a warning.
> > I don't think this will affect the time sync.
> 
> It is just a warning and will not affecet time sync.
> 
> > According to the last line in the result, it prints out the offset in=20
> > seconds , it seems that the print result is good, but the system time=20
> > is not synced a fter
> 
> You used -s, which slews the correction.  The correction is underway, but a=
>  500ppm slew corrects a 1 second change in about 33 minutes.  So it's gonna=
>  take a while.
> 
> I'm not sure why you're using sntp instead of running ntpd, but you might w=
> ant to use -Ss instead.
> 
> H
> --
> > I used the sntp command.
> >
> >
> > Can anyone helps me with that? Appreciate it. It bothered me for=20
> > several days . Thank you very much.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Catherine,
> >
> > Best regards
> > _______________________________________________
> > pool mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Flists.
> > ntp.org%2Flistinfo%2Fpool&data=3D01%7C01%7CCatherine.Wei%40arris.com%7C8
> > ade3ec110e04b1cd68108d456ea7511%7Cf27929ade5544d55837ac561519c3091%7C1
> > &sdata=3DgBaPB4rsWRwbxFhmB0mb4guLTgtjkCsg47F%2Foet0T5Q%3D&reserved=3D0
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Flists.ntp=
> .org%2Flistinfo%2Fpool&data=3D01%7C01%7CCatherine.Wei%40arris.com%7C4fa9cba=
> a165f4fa0440108d456f11337%7Cf27929ade5544d55837ac561519c3091%7C1&sdata=3DGH=
> 0toah8pgDPf5%2B1aPvsyU%2BKkHh682nqOhn11qwMjSc%3D&reserved=3D0
> 
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to