And the line following the one you quoted: "Three of the four .pdf files had no text embedded, just images of the text, which did not permit text searches of the bill. That move to conceal the bill’s provisions had not been remedied this morning at the time of publication of this article."
Doesn't sound like the dem's made them into PDF Searchable Images, just images.... Jarrad On Feb 13, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Lance McCulley wrote: > Dems took hours to convert the final bill from the regular > searchable format into "pdf" files, which can be read but not > searched. > > Has the author never used Adobe Reader or Google Desktop? :-/ > Still, bill should have been ready. > > -Lance > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Jarrad Reiner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Now thats transparency we can believe in :) > > http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30700 > > > Jarrad > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Politically Opinionated Outspoken People Expounding Religion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pooper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
