On Saturday 11 November 2006 17:08, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 11:18:41AM +1100, Brad Hards wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:39, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > > > I'd like to move the test framework that lives in the test module of > > > poppler cvs to git. Given that I seem to be the only one that develops > > > it, I don't really expect any objections. However, I thought it'd be > > > good to ask first anyways. > > > > I would prefer that you leave it in CVS. The qt4 unit tests rely on test > > files that are present in that module. > > I would have no problem leaving the qt4 unit tests in cvs. There is > really no reason that the test suite code needs to be in the same > respository. The qt4 test suite consists of two parts: * the test harness, which provides a compile-time check that no-one has broken source compatibility: http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/qt4/tests/ * the files required for the test harnesses to actually perform the checks: http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/poppler/test/unittestcases/
I don't really mind if you move any of http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/poppler/test/ as long as you leave the unittestcases directory behind. > > If we are talking about making a move, then I'd be happy to see all of > > poppler moved to SVN (or potentially some other tool, but most of the > > decentralised tools presume some kind of central maintainer to pull a > > releasable tree together, and we don't really have anyone who is over all > > of poppler). > > git doesn't have any presumption like this. X and cairo both use git > with a central shared respository (CVS style). So what are you hoping to achieve? Brad
pgphLmUBxFnYR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
