On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 01:58:54PM -0800, mathog wrote: > On 04-Mar-2016 13:49, mathog wrote: > >In tracking down a bug in Inkscape here: > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1538361 > > > >it was discovered that the version of Poppler in devlibs61 appears to > >provide its own printf() functions, which replace the usual ones > > Hmm, or not. Downloaded and unpacked poppler-0.41.0 and found that > > grep -R sprintf . > > did not turn up any code that defines a new function. So now I'm really > mystified. > How would linking in a static libpoppler break an applications' use of a > printf() function if it doesn't define a new one? > > Thanks, > > David Mathog > mat...@caltech.edu > Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
I'm not familiar with compiling for mingw or devlibs, but I'd be curious to see if you run that test program in a debugger and step into the printf function or try the command "info symbol printf" from gdb, to see where the printf function actually goes. _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list poppler@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
