>Can you me more specific about the exact name of the library please?
ldd pdftops shows it as libjbig.so.2.1 => /lib64/libjbig.so.2.1 I have Fedora 25 which might affect the version numbers. dnf provides /usr/lib64/libjbig.so.2.1 returns jbigkit-libs-2.1-5.fc24.x86_64 : JBIG1 lossless image compression library The library is a minor thing, but I remember from a patch that added compression that some compression and decompression libraries have vulnerabilities. At least for testing with my files, the autotools static pdftops with the library and the cmake static pdftops without the library both worked fine. Regards, William ________________________________ From: poppler <[email protected]> on behalf of Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 1:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [poppler] cmake and static binaries El dimecres, 6 de setembre de 2017, a les 20:09:06 CEST, William Bader va escriure: > >You're the one that thinks static builds are a good idea, so you should > >know if it's a problem or not :D > What I meant is that I am not sure if the default build should or should not > include jbig. Either the autotools build is pulling in too much or the > cmake build is missing a test. I think that jbig provides lossless > compression. If it is not linked in, does that mean that poppler loses the > functionality or that poppler uses another library or that poppler uses its > own implementation? Can you me more specific about the exact name of the library please? Cheers, Albert > > > Regards, William > > > ________________________________ > From: Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> on behalf of Albert Astals Cid > <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 1:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: William Bader > Subject: Re: [poppler] cmake and static binaries > > El dimarts, 5 de setembre de 2017, a les 18:40:31 CEST, William Bader va > > escriure: > > Thanks, that worked! > > > > > > I ran 'ldd' on both pdftops executables, and the executable I compiled > > yesterday with autotools has one additional library compared to the one I > > built now with cmake: libjbig > > > > Is that a problem? I reran the autotools build and grep for jbig didn't > > find anything in configure or the makefiles, but ldd pdftops still shows > > it. > You're the one that thinks static builds are a good idea, so you should know > if it's a problem or not :D > > I'll commit that patch anyway it's not a big change and if it makes you > happy something is something. > > Cheers, > Albert > > > Regards, William > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: poppler <[email protected]> on behalf of Albert > > Astals Cid <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 1:32 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [poppler] cmake and static binaries > > > > El dilluns, 4 de setembre de 2017, a les 13:43:10 CEST, William Bader va > > > > escriure: > > > I mainly use the poppler pdftops utility, and with autotools, I have > > > been > > > using --enable-static --disable-shared so that I have a single > > > executable > > > instead of an executable and library. Is there an equivalent with cmake? > > > Adding -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF didn't seem to make any different. > > > Thanks, > > > William > > > > I'm not really very happy supporting static builds but sine this seems to > > be a small change, can you verify this patch works for you? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Albert _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler poppler Info Page - freedesktop.org<https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler> lists.freedesktop.org Subscribing to poppler: Subscribe to poppler by filling out the following form. Use of all freedesktop.org lists is subject to our Code of ...
_______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
