Hi Thomas, > Another confirmation for the S390 port that things still work would be > appreciated too. :)
I have posted on PR as well. I ran tier1 tests and result still looks good on s390x. Thanks, /Amit > On 03/03/2025, at 4:11 PM, Thomas Schatzl <thomas.scha...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > On 22.10.24 10:26, Thomas Schatzl wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> we in the GC team have been experimenting with new post-write > >> barriers for G1 to reduce the throughput difference between G1 and > >> Parallel GC. > >> > >> After quite a few attempts we think we found a balanced solution > >> between overall complexity and impact on throughput and latency. > >> > >> [...] > > On 08.11.24 16:39, Thomas Schatzl wrote: >> Hi all, > >[...] >> The implementation CR also already contains some more information about the >> implemetation (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8342382 ), which will >> also be updated a little before asking for reviews. > > we in the Oracle gc team decided that due to the size of the change (+3k, > -4.4k LOC) are not waiting any longer for the JEP moving to candidate before > asking for reviews. > > There is a PR out for review for this change now [4]. I would like to ask you > maintainers to have a look/test. > > M. Doerr from SAP already confirmed that the change is still working > :)(thanks!). > > I am not expecting any or any serious issues for the other platforms since > not much changed since asking for the ports. However in particular I hope for > feedback from maintainers for the ARM (32 bit) and the RISCV port, as I have > only been able to perform very limited testing using cross-compilers and > emulators there. > > Another confirmation for the S390 port that things still work would be > appreciated too. :) > > Thanks, > Thomas > > [4] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23739
