On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:23:54PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > What I take away from this is that: in order to give the "expected" > Neovim experience, we are going to need to embed the right version of > LuaJIT into Neovim going forward.
I forgot to add. There is a LuaJIT fork (OpenResty) that make occasional tags in an attempt to have "known versions" of LuaJIT. Neovim attempts to support this, although it's not the default LuaJIT dependency. I don't see any point in porting it, unless there are other ports which can consume it (and can all use the same version of it an once). -- Best Regards Edd Barrett https://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
