On Mon 24/04/2023 18:27, kasak wrote: > > 24.04.2023 16:34, Bjorn Ketelaars пишет: > > On Mon 24/04/2023 10:09, kasak wrote: > > > i'm sorry for the noise, but samba package in openbsd has some bug since > > > 7.2 > > > > > > It erroneously map "nobody" as a homes share when it should not. > > I remember replying to a mail from you on misc@ a couple of months ago > > on the same (?) topic [0]. > You are right, and since then I made some research to prove my point!
During your research, did you use the exact same smb.conf on the different samba hosts? And the outcome is that samba on OpenBSD is the odd one out? Are there details that you can share? > > > I have many other samba hosts, and I often use [homes] special share, but > > > it > > > never map "nobody" as a home share. > > Unfortunately I do not have experience with "other smaba hosts", and > > cannot comment on them. Is it possible that samba on these hosts has > > been compiled using other compile time options than on OpenBSD? > > > > [0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=166676711319993&w=2 > > I can speak for all rpm based distros, for arch and for freebsd, no one of > them maps nobody as a homes share. > > And i've tried to figure out what's gone wrong and failed :( that's why i'm > posting here, searching for help. Did you compare the samba port for, e.g., FreeBSD [0] with that of OpenBSD [1]? Are there options that catch your eye? [0] https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/tree/main/net/samba416 [1] https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/net/samba/
