På tirsdag 1. september 2026 kl. 19:00, skrev <[email protected]>:
> På tirsdag 1. september 2026 kl. 16:42, skrev Leah Rowe > <[email protected]>: > > > > > well ahead of you. > > > > i'm about to send a new patch fixing the oversight. > > > > > > Leah, the files don't fetch in the current version, nor with the last > patch? > > $ cd /usr/ports/www/librewolf/ && make fetch > ===> Checking files for librewolf-155.0pl1p0 > `/usr/ports/distfiles/mozilla/librewolf-155.0-1.source.tar.gz' is up to date. > >> No size recorded for mozilla/librewolf-155.0-1.source-profdata.tar.gz > *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:3322 > '/usr/ports/distfiles/mozilla/librewolf-155.0-1.source-profdata.tar.gz': > @lo...) > *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2594 > '_internal-fetch': @cd /usr/ports/www/librewolf && PKGPATH=www/librewolf > exe...) > *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/www/librewolf > (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2722 'fetch': > @lock=librewolf-155.0pl1p0; export _LOCKS_H...) > -- > > Here is quick and dirty patch with the changes in > 0001-www-librewolf-run-make-update-patches-bump-SO_VERSIO.patch > > I apologize for the ugly, but am not knowledgeable enough about that > magic. > > What is in cvs now will break a bulk build. > > Currently building this. > > Hope this helps. > -- > yaydn > > Nevermind. Sorry, my www/mozilla/mozilla.port.mk was not up to date. Sorry for the noise. -- yaydn > > > > Am 01.09.26 um 15:24 schrieb [email protected]: > > > Le Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Leah Rowe a écrit : > > >> question: > > >> > > >> how can I know reliably when to update SO_VERSION? i assume this is when > > >> the > > >> one or more of the library dependencies gets updated, but I can't be > > >> sure. > > >> > > >> Can someone tell me? > > > To add to Landry's response, the 'make check-shlib-syms' can tell you if > something > changed(added, removed); this requires /usr/src from cvs by the way. > Then you can bump if any shared library has changed or if you think > something internal changed to warrant a bump even if this check says > nothing changed. Or generally for a major revision of a port, like > Landry says, bump. > > For this port specifically, you can match any bump in > mozilla-firefox. > > > > > https://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html#SharedLibs > > > > > > but that's a bit special with monsters, i bump by habit at each major > > > release but noone should care, since nothing links against the mozilla > > > libs. > > > > > > fwiw i've commited the previous iteration of the diff because i had to > > > move on to other things. follow cvs commits... > > > > -- > > Company director, Minifree Ltd > > Registered in England, No. 9361826 | VAT No. GB202190462 > > Registered Office: 19 Hilton Road, Canvey Island, Essex SS8 9QA, UK > > > >
