On 2026/09/23 09:57, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> devel/py-litellm pins importlib-metadata>=8.0.0,<9.0
> breaking the update of importlib-metadata 9.0.1
> As discussed here is the diff
>
> OK?
I don't see anything in the way that litellm uses importlib-metadata
that could break with the looser pin. (Although they should just use
importlib.metadata from stdlib as it should be fine for all Python
versions they claim to support; it was added provisionally in 3.8,
and made non-provisional in 3.10).
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-litellm/Makefile,v
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.3 Makefile
> --- Makefile 31 Aug 2026 23:43:55 -0000 1.3
> +++ Makefile 23 Sep 2026 07:48:07 -0000
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ COMMENT= uniform API for multiple LLM pr
> MODPY_DISTV= 1.90.2
> DISTNAME= litellm-${MODPY_DISTV}
> PKGNAME= py-${DISTNAME}
> -REVISION= 0
> +REVISION= 1
>
> CATEGORIES= devel
>
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ MODPY_PYBUILD= uv_build
>
> RUN_DEPENDS = devel/py-click<9.0 \
> devel/py-fastuuid<1.0 \
> - devel/py-importlib-metadata<9.0 \
> + devel/py-importlib-metadata \
> devel/py-jsonschema<5.0 \
> devel/py-pydantic<3.0.0 \
> sysutils/py-dotenv<2.0 \
> Index: patches/patch-pyproject_toml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-litellm/patches/patch-pyproject_toml,v
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 patch-pyproject_toml
> --- patches/patch-pyproject_toml 19 Jul 2026 19:29:36 -0000 1.1.1.1
> +++ patches/patch-pyproject_toml 23 Sep 2026 07:48:07 -0000
> @@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
> Index: pyproject.toml
> --- pyproject.toml.orig
> +++ pyproject.toml
> +@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ dependencies = [
> + "openai>=2.20.0,<3.0.0",
> + "python-dotenv>=1.0.0,<2.0",
> + "tiktoken>=0.8.0,<1.0",
> +- "importlib-metadata>=8.0.0,<9.0",
> ++ "importlib-metadata>=8.0.0",
> + "tokenizers>=0.21.0,<1.0",
> + "click>=8.0.0,<9.0",
> + "jinja2>=3.1.6,<4.0",
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ healthcheck = [
> ]
>
>
