> Deployed this on my server and I don't see any issue so far. In fact,
> prosody is communicating over TLS without problems, so I'd it's OK
> from prosody side.
thanks for testing, i have just committed the luasec update.
> Regarding setting NO_TEST, bsd.port.mk(5) says it should be set to Yes
> "only for ports with no regression test", so I'm not sure if using Yes
> here would be an abuse.
yes, right.
maybe we should add a comment showing that failure is kwown.
? prosofy.diff
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/prosody/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -p -r1.57 Makefile
--- Makefile 2 Jun 2020 07:22:46 -0000 1.57
+++ Makefile 23 Jun 2020 11:16:39 -0000
@@ -20,7 +20,10 @@ MODLUA_RUN_DEPENDS+= databases/luadbi \
devel/luafs \
security/luasec \
textproc/luaexpat>=1.3.0
+
+# fails, depends on busted not yet in
TEST_DEPENDS = ${MODLUA_RUN_DEPENDS}
+
WANTLIB+= crypto idn
CONFIGURE_STYLE=simple
