On 2012/01/19 09:52, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Stuart Henderson <st...@cvs.openbsd.org> > wrote: > > On 2012/01/19 09:43, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > >> Ouch, has upstream been notified? > > > > is there any point? > > if like freebsd, you want to keep llvm as a future option, you need to > have as much support for all arches as possible... looking at the > freebsd llvm/clang page, they don't have either of sparc or sparc64 > listed > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#target_features
