On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:21:41PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Antoine Jacoutot <ajacou...@bsdfrog.org> wrote: > > >>>Why is the python3 FLAVOR needed in the first place ? > >> > >> Basically to avoid forcing particular python version. > > > >I am not sure this is a really valid reason. > >Last time I talked about the same thing to sthen@ we agreed \ > >it did not make sense to have FLAVORs for python ports that \ > >aren't lib/modules. > >At the time I was pondering the idea of having sysutils/awscli,python3 > > From my perspective ability to use python3 if desired has some value,
Sure. I think sthen@ actually said we should go with python3 only on this port. > and I don't see a good argument against it. Another dimension to this > is the migration to python3 as default python version in future, which > would be facilitated by adding python3 flavors to ports where that is > possible. That would provide a clearer picture of the state of affairs. > > That said, I don't have a strong position on this question, and I don't > really care much for the python3 flavor of this particular port. Do you > want me to revert the change? Yes please. -- Antoine