On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:21:41PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Antoine Jacoutot <ajacou...@bsdfrog.org> wrote:
> 
> >>>Why is the python3 FLAVOR needed in the first place ?
> >> 
> >> Basically to avoid forcing particular python version.
> >
> >I am not sure this is a really valid reason.
> >Last time I talked about the same thing to sthen@ we agreed \
> >it did not make sense to have FLAVORs for python ports that \
> >aren't lib/modules.
> >At the time I was pondering the idea of having sysutils/awscli,python3
> 
> From my perspective ability to use python3 if desired has some value,

Sure. I think sthen@ actually said we should go with python3 only on this port.

> and I don't see a good argument against it.  Another dimension to this
> is the migration to python3 as default python version in future, which
> would be facilitated by adding python3 flavors to ports where that is
> possible.  That would provide a clearer picture of the state of affairs.
> 
> That said, I don't have a strong position on this question, and I don't
> really care much for the python3 flavor of this particular port.  Do you
> want me to revert the change?

Yes please.

-- 
Antoine

Reply via email to