On 25/10/2023 11:12, Vidar Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:22:11AM +0200, Dutch Daemon - FreeBSD Forums 
Administrator wrote:
On October 24, 2023 14:54:40 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator
<dutchdae...@freebsd.org>  wrote:
Does anyone in 'port land' know what the current developments are wrt
CertBot (or py-crypto under its hood)?
CertBot is happily compiling against OpenSSL 3 from ports, but when
running 'certbot', the crypto side of it talks to the base system
OpenSSL 1.1.1, hence failing because the OpenSSL 1.1.1 library does not
understand the OpenSSL 3 calls made to it.
 From what I understood, this was due to an error/regression in
pkgconf(?) which causes some type of 'path reversal' that causes
py-crypto to ignore the OpenSSL it was compiled against, favoring the
base system library.
I either have to revert a whole lot of servers back to OpenSSL 1.1.1w
from ports in order to renew certificates, or wait for "any movement" in
getting the path reversal addressed/fixed.
So: does anyone know where we're at with this?

Memory jog:


Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/certbot", line 33, in <module>
   sys.exit(load_entry_point('certbot==2.6.0', 'console_scripts', 'certbot')())
File "/usr/local/bin/certbot", line 25, in importlib_load_entry_point
   return next(matches).load()
[...]
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cryptography/exceptions.py",
line 9, in <module>
   from cryptography.hazmat.bindings._rust import exceptions as rust_exceptions
ImportError: 
/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/bindings/_rust.abi3.so:
Undefined symbol "EVP_default_properties_is_fips_enabled"
What solved this problem for me was to apply the v2 patch from the
pkgconf PR 273961 [1].

The next hurdly you'll probably run into [2] can be solved by running
certbot with the following env variable:
CRYPTOGRAPHY_OPENSSL_NO_LEGACY=1

[1]https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273961
[2]https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273656

Hope this helps!


This patch certainly did it for me, hope it gets committed soon (if it doesn't pose a regression hazard). I did not run into the other problem.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to