On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 03:28:16PM +0200, Moritz Grimm wrote:
>
> 1. Doxygen documentation
<snip>
> but which PSEUDO_FLAVOR do
> you want? ``docs'' or ``no_docs''?
>
> 2. (Optional) dependencies
> This part is related to 1., since the optional RUN_DEPENDS (which could
> be left as a simple note in pkg/DESCR like in Aleksander's port) become
> BUILD_DEPENDS for the documentation.
is it true that the denominator in the question is whether people installing
the port will likely need/want to have the docuementation or not.
if it seems likely that most people will not fancy having the docs
installed by default, then it would seem that ``docs'' and putting
a BUILD_DEPENDS+= inside the .if ${FLAVOR} would be good; or otherwise
if most people will want the docs, making ``no_docs'' and then
rewriting the BUILD_DEPENDS back to stock ( is there a BUILD_DEPENDS-= ? )
might be ok if you want to save them the time.
jared
-
[ openbsd 3.7 GENERIC ( jun 12 ) // i386 ]
