hmm, on Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:16:55PM -0500, Ian Darwin said that > frantisek holop wrote: > > >hmm, on Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:06:06PM -0500, Ian Darwin said that > > > > > >>I agree. It needs to get committed so we can move ahead, and it's better > >>than what it replaces. > >> > >> > >perhaps waiting a bit won't hurt: > >http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=13049 > > > Our testing has not shown up any of those instabilities. The article > claims that 450 of the > tens of thousands who have downloaded 1.5 have had stability problems.
don't get me wrong, i am not trying to pick a fight here but how many users have the ability to diagnoze these issues? firefox acting funny? no problem, just restart it. i posted the link only because at work (windows xp so bit OT) i see some of these issues. some pages throw the new beautiful "page not found error," but a reload brings it up nice. or pages come up with images which never load and yet are not broken.. i have also noticed some strange issues with forms. and only been using it for a week or so, maybe 10 days. my personal experience so far is, that 1.0.7 was more stable. of course, that's just me, i just wanted to point out that some people have issues. > if you build your own). Or, if you want even more stability, stay with > the stable branch. 1.5 is considered stable branch i think.. -f -- nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool.
