On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:57:29PM -0400, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote: > > I specifically did NOT update www/p5-libapreq, because the developers > > switched > > from the Apache 1.0 to Apache 2.0 licence between 1.32 and 1.33, so this > > warrants further discussions. > > There are already other instances of apache 2.0 licensed code being > distributed in the ports tree. devel/apr and devel/apr-util for instance. > > While I am not a fan of the license, we certainly ship other software with > more restrictive licenses. What exactly is the issue ?
Actually, I haven't looked very far yet. Licence review is not something I love doing, it's just stuff I do from time to time because somebody HAS to. I was mostly concerned in getting the rest of those ports updated first... without any reaction from 2 maintainers so far... I've got `a chance' to play with an installation using Apache2 and mod_perl2 since then, and I must say, I'm not impressed. Not having internal_redirect() sucks, and I wonder what the apache guys are doing... I'm getting more and more happy that we're staying with Apache1.
