On 9/26/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006/09/26 00:00, viq wrote:
> On 9/25/06, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 9/25/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 2006/09/25 23:09, viq wrote:
> >> > On 9/22/06, Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >Come on people - why did this get dropped???
> >> >
> >> > Would it be possible to repost the patch as attachement? Posting
> >> > inline breaks formatting and it doesn't really want to apply...
> >>
> >> inline is fine with many standard MUAs (and even some list archives; you
> >could
> >> use
> >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-ports&m=114312793429494&q=raw)
> >
> >Ah, sorry for the noise than, and thank you for a useful piece of
> >information :)
>
> well, i downloaded the patches from there using lynx -dump, deleted
> the first lines of the mail... And neither the patch applies cleanly,
> nor the patches created by it.
that's lynx for you :) how about
ftp -o- http://foo | (cd /usr/ports/bar;patch)
lol, ok. Indeed, using ftp at least the generated patches apply
cleanly, though I had to modify Makefile manually. Building it now.
--
viq
