--- STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 October 2006 21:06, Adam wrote: > > "STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PHP5 fixed how many problems over PHP4? > > > > None? > > > > > People should be using 5, so this is the right thing to do. > > > > People "should be using" whatever they need. And some people need > > PHP4. There is no reason for them to upgrade to 5, so for the people > > who have code that doesn't work in 5, there's no incentive to rewrite > > it. > > > > > I'd go so far as to remove PHP 4 right after 4.1 comes out. > > > > That's just plain dumb. It doesn't hurt to leave the port there for > > people who need it. > > > > Adam > > Following that logic, telnetd, rlogind and others should still be > in the tree. Your logic is flawed. You aren't comparing apples to apples here. Think about it. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
