Brian Callahan <bcal...@protonmail.com> writes:

> Hi ports --
>
> This diff fixes gophernicus with -fno-common.
> I didn't update it since upstream has a new and broken build process.
> Also drop myself as maintainer.
>
> OK?

The patch reads OK but I don't understand why these would get declared
given the statement that we don't have libwrap?

>
> ~Brian
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/gophernicus/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.19
> diff -u -p -r1.19 Makefile
> --- Makefile  6 Feb 2020 18:06:10 -0000       1.19
> +++ Makefile  10 Feb 2021 01:57:11 -0000
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.19 2020/02/06 18:06:10 edd Exp $
>  
>  COMMENT=     modern gopher server
> +REVISION =   0
>  
>  GH_ACCOUNT=  gophernicus
>  GH_PROJECT=  gophernicus
> @@ -9,8 +10,6 @@ GH_TAGNAME=  v3.0.1
>  CATEGORIES=  net
>  
>  HOMEPAGE=    gopher://gophernicus.org/
> -
> -MAINTAINER = Brian Callahan <bcal...@openbsd.org>
>  
>  # BSD
>  PERMIT_PACKAGE=      Yes
> Index: patches/patch-gophernicus_c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: patches/patch-gophernicus_c
> diff -N patches/patch-gophernicus_c
> --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> +++ patches/patch-gophernicus_c       10 Feb 2021 01:57:11 -0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +$OpenBSD$
> +
> +We don't have libwrap, and these cause issues with -fno-common
> +
> +Index: gophernicus.c
> +--- gophernicus.c.orig
> ++++ gophernicus.c
> +@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@
> +  * Libwrap needs these defined
> +  */
> + #ifdef HAVE_LIBWRAP
> +-int allow_severity = LOG_DEBUG;
> +-int deny_severity = LOG_ERR;
> + #endif
> + 
> + 

Reply via email to