On 2021/02/09 17:44, Greg Steuck wrote: > The current state of the port is broken by -fno-commit which took out > erlang19. On top of that the imported version has known security issues > and EOLed upstream support. I'm inclined to remove the port and let > somebody who needs the port send a working version with resolved > security issues.
sebastia@, could you comment please? are you still using this? The bad security issues fixed are Windows-specific, the others (XSS and DoS in management interfaces) there are probably much worse than those in other ports. It is overdue an update though. > OK to remove net/rabbitmq? If it is going, I would prefer to mark BROKEN than remove. It is quite possobly something that someone will want to fix at some point and cvs makes it a pain to readd removed ports.
