Stuart Henderson: > I think we are getting to the stage where we should just mark them BROKEN > with an identifiable tag, so that we don't have to wade through them when > identifying other ports breakage in builds. > > Then if no updates happen maybe remove them in a few months (say, a bit > after 6.9 is done).
If that approach had been suggested earlier, I wouldn't have spent time fixing random ports I have no interest in. How about we all give it a big push and fix the remaining ones? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
