On 2021/05/16 14:23, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 12:19:09AM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 10:04:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > It is a both-compilers architecture.
> >
> > It has both in base, but ports doesn't consider it having clang in base.
> >
> > It's not listed under CLANG_ARCHS
>
> If base has switched to using clang for default builds, ports should as
> well...
> cautiously, with a bulk ;)
>
It has not; the place to check this is GCC4_ARCH in bsd.own.mk which
takes priority over CLANG_ARCH. (both-compilers and preferring clang would
look like amd64 did until recently; special exemption in ".if
!empty(GCC4_ARCH:M${_arch})\nBUILD_GCC4?=yes").
Specifically ports can't use base-clang unless X is also built with
base-clang (and likewise if X is built with base-clang then ports must be
too).
