On 2021/07/05 11:25, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 12:13:38PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > ok jca@ fwiw but as I said Edd has a wip update to 2.3.1. > > In hindsight, I think using Stuart's 2.2.29 diff would be better. > Upstream describes 2.3.x as "the start of public testing releases". I > think we should give users the most stable packages we can. > > In addition to sthen@'s diff, here's updates to libksba and pinentry. > > If those are committed, then the only out-of-date gnupg-related > component would be gpgme (which I've not had time to look at yet, > sorry).
I can take a look at gpgme. > With libksba, although upstream did major bumps, I can't see any reason > to do so based on the changes I see to the public API. Hence I've not > bumped our SO version, but someone should double check my work. We could > just bump it to be sure. They replaced some parts in the middle of struct ksba_cms_s, this struct is in src/cms.h which isn't in an installed header but it is used in prototypes that are in the installed ksba.h. So I'm a bit unsure whether bumping is needed or not but I think I'd go with "if in doubt, bump" here to be on the safe side. Otherwise those are OK sthen@
