Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> wrote: > Theo de Raadt wrote on Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 09:12:58AM -0600: > > Ian Darwin <i...@darwinsys.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 04:47:46PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > >>>> Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2021/07/27 05:55:36 > >>>> > >>>> Modified files: > >>>> sysutils/bat : Makefile > >>>> > >>>> Log message: > >>>> set sysutils/bat to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=${LP64_ARCHS}, one of the 147 > >>>> dependencies (sys-info) has a 32 vs 64 bit issue when checking > >>>> the number of CPUs online > > >>> Wait, a cat with 147 dependencies? Looks like it's a rabbit after all! > >>> At least there can be no doubt that it inhabits a rabbit hole, doesn't it? > >>> > >>> Besides, isn't a program that stops working once your machine has > >>> more than four billion CPUs utterly useless in the 31st century? > >>> > >>> If it didn't constantly trip up otherwise busy porters, this port > >>> would be a really good laugh. > >>> > >>> *Looking at the calendar* > >>> No, it's unlikely to be the Easter bunny. > >>> We are not that close to Apil 1. > > >> And to think that Rob Pike once wrote a paper "cat -v considered harmful" > >> since it added unnecessary functionality to cat, whose only job is > >> to catenate files... > > > bat is my favorite rust program > > > > please continue maintaining it in ports, > > i don't want the standup comedy to end > > I didn't mean to summon tedu@ regarding the port, > quite to the contary, i might even contribute to it! > > https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/pull/1756
I won't use bat until it has an emacs mode.