Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes:

> On 2021/09/08 22:07, Omar Polo wrote:
>> 
>> Denis Fondras <open...@ledeuns.net> writes:
>> 
>> > RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly C++ library alternative to
>> > backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE,
>> > Perl, and Python.
>> >
>> > https://github.com/google/re2
>> >
>> > [2. application/x-tar-gz; re2-20210901.tgz]...
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I had a local port for an earlier version of re2 because it was a
>> dependency of something I was working on (that rotted on mystuff
>> probably)
>> 
>> Anyway, the ports needs some adjustments:
>> 
>>  - make port-lib-depends-check complains about missing WANTLIB on
>>    ``${COMPILER_LIBCXX} m''
>>  - since it's a c++ library it's probably more useful to install also
>>    the re2Config.cmake file probably
>>  - it installs the library as lib/libre2.so.9 and libre2.so.9.0.0: in
>>    ports we usually override upstream version with a sensible one
>>    (starting at 0 for new ports)
>>  - it's missing the COMPILER line: it needs C++11 so `base-clang
>>    ports-gcc' should be enough
>
> all correct
>
>>  - the patch for the makefile isn't needed, we can override CXX with
>> 
>>      MAKE_ENV += CXX=${CXX}
>
> It uses = in the Makefile so it needs MAKE_FLAGS rather than MAKE_ENV 
> (flags overrides variables set in the makefile, but isn't typically
> propagated to submakes. env does not override but is propagated. so
> both are needed sometimes, but usually flags is best).
>
>> Attaching a tarball with the mentioned stuff fixed and the build
>> switched from the provided makefile to cmake (that installs the
>> re2Config.cmake file and picks the correct C++ compiler).
>> 
>> (The CMakefile needed some massaging to avoid hardcoding the soname)
>
> As-is the version number is not set in the filename of the produced
> library. This is because the name in SHARED_LIBS has a "lib" prefix which
> shouldn't be there. Remove the patch and set the correct SHARED_LIBS
> then the cmake module will take care of it.

that's correct, I didn't noticed the lib prefix, apologies.  Attaching
an updated tarball.

P.S.: I see that there was already a devel/re2 port in openbsd-wip by
bcallah@

Attachment: re2.tar.gz
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to