On 4/25/07, Bernd Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benoit Chesneau [Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:27:51AM +0200] wrote: > On 4/23/07, Pierre-Yves Ritschard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> . prepare a version replacing fvwm2, there's no need to >> maintain the 2.4 series which handle EWMH poorly and aren't more stable >> than the 2.5 series. > > About that i don't know what to do. To replace fvwm2, don't you just > have to change PKGNAME variable ? Please tell me . > Have you guys talked to the fvwm2 port maintainer?Regards, Bernd
for now I just provide a fvwm2-devel port. Nothing to related to stable version and I don't know what to do about fvwm2 stable version and of course this is the maintainer decision :) Think he read the mailing list too. In the mean time I will contact him about it. - benoit bchesneau.info | neurofriends.net | osbud.net
