On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:20:13PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > On 10/28/2021 8:42 AM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28 2021, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 28 2021, Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de> wrote: > > > > I ran an amd64 bulk build with base clang updated to LLVM 13. > > > > > > > > There is substantial fallout. Java appears to be broken and there > > > > are numerous failures caused by clang 13 issuing new warnings and > > > > ports using -Werror. > > > > > > > > Failure logs: > > > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/amd64-clang/2021-10-27/ > > > > > > > > The final error may be misleading. For instance, devel/libdsm fails > > > > with a linker error "undefined reference to pthread_create", but > > > > the root cause is -Werror breaking a configure check. > > > > > > > > Below there's a list of affected ports. Several hundred more weren't > > > > built because they depend on something that failed. > > > > > > > > audio/cmus > > > jsg@ pointed out that this new clang defines __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ > > > which is most likely wrong. This breaks at least cmus: > > > > > > > > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/amd64-clang/2021-10-27/audio/cmus.log > > Brad, are you sure that this change is 100% correct? > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d8cd7806310c51af912a647a6ca46de62ff13214 > > > > Should we drop the __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ define? > > The atomics part was my misunderstanding and is wrong. I have reverted it > upstream and will > have it merged into 13. >
v3 of my LLVM patchset (and also my llvm13 github branch) do now both contain the partial revert.
