On 2021/11/24 11:27, joshua stein wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 18:09:33 +0100, Clemens Gößnitzer wrote: > > Beginning with this email, I'll send out a couple of new ports which are all > > dependencies for www/ruby-jekyll. With these, I get a working jekyll for my > > applications. I tested that `serve' and `build' commands work, and > > --incremental and --watch flags, too. If you have some more tests, I'd be > > happy > > to know if something does not work. > > Is there really any reason to keep this in the ports tree? I > thought we were doing away with ports for simple Ruby modules. > > Jekyll installs fine with Bundler and since I'd imagine most would > need a custom Gemfile with other things in it anyway, why bother > having a system-wide Jekyll installation that will be ~6 months out > of date in each OpenBSD release? >
Besides this, sending a batch of this many new ports in one go is too much for us to deal with, manageable chunks please. Max 3 or 4 at once would be more like it (keep dependency chains together, in a single email if they're fairly closely related).
