On 2021/12/03 10:20, Omar Polo wrote:
> Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes:
> 
> > On 2021/12/03 09:07, Omar Polo wrote:
> >> Hello ports,
> >> 
> >> % pkg_info libfixposix
> >> Information for inst:libfixposix-0.4.3
> >> 
> >> Comment:
> >> thin wrapper over POSIX syscalls
> >> 
> >> Description:
> >> The purpose of libfixposix is to offer replacements for parts of POSIX
> >> whose behaviour is inconsistent across *NIX flavours.
> >> 
> >> Maintainer: The OpenBSD ports mailing-list <ports@openbsd.org>
> >> 
> >> WWW: https://github.com/sionescu/libfixposix
> >> 
> >> 
> >> there are some common lisp libraries that depends on this.  I ported it
> >> around one year ago because I needed it for a x11/stumpwm extension, but
> >> there were issues with the common lisp library iolib.  These issues were
> >> fixed recently, so here's the port.
> >> 
> >> OK?
> >> 
> >> P.S.: only one doubt: the port is written in C99 which should be ok for
> >> base-gcc right?
> >> 
> >
> > : CONFIGURE_STYLE =       gnu autoreconf
> >
> > s/gnu //, and please set AUTOCONF_VERSION/AUTOMAKE_VERSION to something less
> > of an antique than the defaults.
> 
> Sure!
> 
> Here's an updated tarball with CONFIGURE_STYLE=autoreconf and
> 
> AUTOCONF_VERSION=2.71
> AUTOMAKE_VERSION=1.16
> 

Nitpicking but I'm not a fan of mixing "VAR=" and "VAR =" in the same
Makefile, other than that OK with me.

Reply via email to