Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 02:48:14PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> is there a policy decision (licensing?) for sticking with ghostscript 9.07
> from 2013 in ports, or is the port just hard to maintain / is there a lack
> of time and interest in it?
It's hard to maintain *and* i don't have much time.
In case anyone want's to step in: it's probably best to start over
mostly from scratch and let it build all dependencies bundled in
the source tarball instead of trying to convince the broken make
system using system libraries and libraries from other ports.
Ciao,
Kili
