On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 06:04:17PM +0000, Philipp Buehler wrote: > Am 28.09.2022 18:43 schrieb Stuart Henderson: > > > > > This makes me think "what are the other ones for then?" if they're > > discussed in a section about firewall rules. Maybe say "exposed to > > the network" and then say that the others are only used for local > > communications between the daemons? > > The many from prosody do not belong here, since only 5280 and 5222 is > *needed* > Also the 8080 and 8888 for jvb/jicofo are "only" for monitoring and not > operations per se. > > > IPv6 is of course a real mess with Java on OpenBSD with the forced > > IPV6_V6ONLY thing:( > > Didn't try IPv6 at all, all v4 is fine (and makes ok for a localhost setup > since a generic > v6 only on OpenBSD is rather not around soon?) > > > These files want to go into a meta port don't they? Sending that as a > > tgz would sidestep the line-wrapping issues ;) > > Yes, meta in the makings where this goes in as a pkg-readme. > > -- > pb > > I sent private email to that guy about your work at eurobsdcon. I think you should work together and get this stuff in better shape before it's committed.
I would really like to be able to just pkg_add jitsi-server (possibly a meta port), start it up, and have jitsi "just work" :)