> On Wed Sep 14, 2022 at 6:18 PM CEST, Thim Cederlund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here's a port for dragon, it is a program that acts as a drag-and-drop > > source > > or sink. You can drag files FROM it and TO it basically. I find myself drag > > and dropping stuff all the time and I don't use a GUI file manager so this > > makes > > things easy. > > > > Now to the awkward stuff, the package name "dragon" is already taken by > > x11/kde-applications/dragon so I opted for xdragon. I noticed however that > > the > > Arch Linux User Repository package name is "dragon-drop" so maybe we should > > name it the same for the sake of consistency?
dragon-drop seems more popular than dragon or xdragon judging from repology: https://repology.org/project/dragon-drag-and-drop/versions > > I added a custom do-install target in order to install the LICENSE file and > > the renamed files. I think we can live without a copy of the GPL, i don't think it should be installed. upstream makefile seems to have some support for renaming. Setting NAME=dragon-drop as FAKE_FLAGS seems to do it. > > Let me know what you guys think. nitpick: i'd consistently use += for WANTLIB, like `make port-lib-depends-check' outputs. the license is actually GPLv3+ due to the "or any later version" clausole. --- Briefly tested, seems to work just fine, thanks! Here's a tweaked tarball that's OK op@ to import
dragon-drop.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
