Ah ok, now makes sense.
> On Oct 25, 2022, at 1:22 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > If there are two versions of a library are in the ports tree, it must > be possible to install them both at the same time, they may not conflict. > > Otherwise there is a problem in bulk builds where one port depends > on one version of the library, and another port depends on the other > version. > >> On 2022/10/25 12:56, Chris wrote: >> Hello, >> >> https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/ports/security/polarssl/Makefile >> Not sure what you mean there is no mbedtls port, it's called polarssl and it >> fetches mbedtls. >> >> polarssl3 just install mbedtls 3.2.1 ? >> >> Ideally this should be renamed to mbedtls/mbedtls-lts and mbedtls3 >> >> Chris >> >>> On 10/25/2022 12:46 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> On 2022/10/25 12:16, Chris wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Guess I should of asked first as ports has >>>> https://openports.se/security/polarssl >>> >>> btw openports.se is not an authoritative source and has various >>> problems with its parsing of the ports tree. >>> >>>> Reading the Makefile it mentions mbedtls but the name was >>>> changed some time ago to mbedtls. >>>> >>>> the LTS is the 2.28.1 and the current versions is 3.2.1 >>>> >>>> So I decided to create a polarssl3 keeping the current name. >>> >>> To import this in a new directory it would need to be de-conflicted with >>> the existing mbedtls port, but better to update the existing port >>> ideally. >>> >>>> Please find attached tar file as requested. >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/25/2022 11:29 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>>>> On 2022/10/25 09:56, Chris wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> First attempt at creating a new port for polarssl3 3.x version >>>>> >>>>> Please don't send shars. CVS diff or git diff preferred for updates, tar >>>>> for new ports. >>>>> >>>>> To import this in a new directory it would need to be de-conflicted with >>>>> the existing mbedtls port, but better to update the existing port >>>>> ideally. >>>>> >>> >>> >
