On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:22:17AM +0900, SASANO Takayoshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Let's keep it simple like:
> > /usr/local/lib/alsa-lib/...
> > /usr/local/include/alsa-lib/...
>
> Really? I thought:
>
> /usr/local/alsa-lib/include
> /usr/local/alsa-lib/lib
Sure this is fine as well :-)
> (how about /usr/local/linux-alsa/{include,lib}?)
>
> Both are not difficult to write alsa-lib's Makefile
> but very hard to porting apps to /usr/local/lib/alsa-lib and
> /usr/local/include/alsa-lib.
>
> In alsa-utils, about 50 or more files are needed to be patched
> if header files are stored into /usr/local/include/alsa-lib .
>
> I think this is too much, but simply do write a patch that
> it is still neccesary...
> --
> SASANO Takayoshi (JG1UAA) <u...@mx5.nisiq.net>
>
--
Antoine
