On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:43:02PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi there, > > When porting "make update-plist" seems to leave all your @comment's > intact, this is good. What is the policy on @exec/@unexec. On one of > my SUBDIRS it leaves them intact but moves them 2 lines back from the > end of the list (Puts some @commented dirs after them for some > reason). On another SUBDIR it insists on removing them.
make update-plist is supposed to attach exec/unexec to the nearest actual object, comments don't count as objects... If it removes them, it's probably some multi-packages fuck-up. update-plist is a bit brittle wrt multi-packages, still...
