On 09/02 12:49, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023/09/02 13:43, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Sat Sep 02, 2023 at 12:33:56PM +0100, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 12:09???PM Rafael Sadowski <raf...@sizeofvoid.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat Sep 02, 2023 at 09:56:10AM +0000, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > > > > After going through all of our Ruby ports, I think we should remove > > > > > the > > > > > ports listed below. These are a set of leaf ports (some of these > > > > > ports > > > > > depend on others in the set, but nothing outside this set depends on > > > > > something inside this set). These are all pure-ruby ports that don't > > > > > benefit from packaging. > > > > > > > > That means we can install it by using gem(1), correct? > > > > > > > > > > Correct. OpenBSD packages for ruby gems should be equivalent > > > to what you would get by installing the gem directly. > > > > > > > Perfect, ok to send all of them to Attic. I guess this is going to take > > a couple of hours and some CVS mistakes :D > > we have done way bigger commits than this without screwing up ;) > the slowest bit is probably writing the quirks entries..
Ruby ports are generally buildable for 3-4 different Ruby versions, so we generally do not add quirks for removed Ruby ports. Instead, when a Ruby version goes out of a support, a general quirk is added that handles all packages for that Ruby version. Rafael is probably correct that it is going to take a couple of hours. Hopefully he is wrong about the CVS mistakes, but we'll see. :) I plan to do the removal on September 6, to give people time to speak up in case they want to keep any of the ports. Thanks, Jeremy
