On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:36:53PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:26:41PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote: > > > Index: pkg/PLIST > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/tellico/pkg/PLIST,v > > > retrieving revision 1.2 > > > diff -u -u -r1.2 PLIST > > > --- pkg/PLIST 28 Apr 2007 16:15:41 -0000 1.2 > > > +++ pkg/PLIST 5 Jul 2007 11:23:40 -0000 > > > @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ > > > @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.2 2007/04/28 16:15:41 espie Exp $ > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] %D/bin/update-desktop-database > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] %D/bin/update-desktop-database > > > bin/tellico > > > share/applications/kde/tellico.desktop > > > share/apps/kconf_update/tellico-rename.upd > > > @@ -212,4 +214,5 @@ > > > share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/tellico.mo > > > share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/tellico.mo > > > share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/tellico.mo > > > +share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/tellico.mo > > > share/mimelnk/application/x-tellico.desktop > > > > Does it make a difference where @exec/@unexec lines are placed in the > > file? Should they be on the bottom? > > Yes, it makes a difference, of course. And these are wrongly placed.
Okay, you mean: man pkg_create /^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just for the archives, where this is documented. Thanks for the heads up. Regards, ahb
