Could it be this?

https://bugreports.qt.io/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/QBS-1684/comment/640130

Franz Jung
Added 26 Jan '23 09:38

Clang >= 13
Opitmizes the JSC::ExecState::removeHostCallFrameFlag and JSC::ExecState::hasHostCallFrameFlag calls away (file qtscript/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/interpreter/CallFrame.h) Thats the reason why an 0x1 pointer instead of an nullptr gets propagated around.

so if you change these to static member funtctions instead of non-static to remove/check for HostCallFrame it should work.

see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60294

--
 Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.

On 3 December 2023 09:09:05 Jonathan Armani <jonat...@armani.tech> wrote:

Le vendredi 1 décembre 2023 à 19:46, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> a écrit :




Do you need -O0 or does -O1 also work?

Yes, I tried -01 first without success.


The last opt level on the command line is used, or doesn't really matter if
the existing one is present when you're overriding the default.

--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.

On 1 December 2023 14:26:01 Jonathan Armani jonat...@armani.tech wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I hit an identical crash than QCAD in QT Script while playing with Mixxx.
>
> After trying some upstream fixes I found this solution in FreeBSD port.
> Hope it will fix QCAD too, I'm not using it.
>
> I'm not sure this is the best way to overide with CXXFLAGS as both -O2 & -O0
> are present in the generated build command.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/qt5/qtscript/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.13
> diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile
> --- Makefile 13 Jul 2022 15:48:58 -0000 1.13
> +++ Makefile 30 Nov 2023 20:29:46 -0000
> @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
> QT5NAME = QtScript
> COMMENT-main = ECMAScript language for Qt5
> +REVISION-main = 1
> +
> +# https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265989
> +CXXFLAGS += -O0
>
> MULTI_PACKAGES = -main -examples
> SHARED_LIBS += Qt5Script 3.0 # 5.9

Reply via email to