Johannes Thyssen Tishman: > Subject says it all. I'm wondering if using the git conversion > of the ports tree[0] is regarded as a good alternative to CVS for > working with ports.
If you are more comfortable with Got[1] or Git, by all means use them. sthen@ has already explained the limits of the conversion. > Do any of you porters use it instead of CVS? I've mostly switched to Got for all of OpenBSD, and treat CVS as write-only. From the format of the patches flying around, it's obvious that there are a number of committers that use Got or Git. > [0] https://github.com/openbsd/ports https://codeberg.org/OpenBSD/ports [1] https://gameoftrees.org/ -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
