On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:18:57 +0000 Edd Barrett <e...@theunixzoo.co.uk> wrote: > Here's an updated diff. > > I made a couple of tweaks: > - Added the required REVISION bump. > - You had `:openfiles-cur=4096:\` twice. I assume you meant openfiles-max for > the second occurance?
Yes good catch! I definitely meant to do -max for the second occurance just like your previous example. Thank you. -- Jag Talon (he/him) https://jagtalon.net/ https://weirder.earth/@jag https://aangat.lahat.computer
