Le Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:29:28AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit : > Simple qt6 signond port. It was easier and cleaner to create a new port > then to add qt6 flavor in the currert net/signond. > > Upstream, it doesn't matter what package maintaienr has to fight. > > OK to import? No conflicts at all.
i find it a bit ugly to patch all the .pro files to avoid building twice all the signond bits which are built in net/signond... how ugly was it to add a qt6 flavor to the latter ? if you really insist on having another port, isn't it simpler to avoid the patches, build everything and remove the conflicting/unwanted bits in post-install or @comment them in PLIST ? other than that, ok with me.
