Yep I agree completely, I'm taking a stab at this at this very moment as
a matter of fact.
On 2024-07-29 4:21 p.m., Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:22 PM Kirill A. Korinsky <kir...@korins.ky>
wrote:
diff --git sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST
index e910ea53f53..5bd3b06e2fe 100644
--- sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST
+++ sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+@conflict boost-*
bin/b2
bin/b2v3
bin/b2v4
and, finally, added a conflict with boost. Both port contains
/usr/local/bin/b2 but such conflict makes installing it quite
tricky because
a bit less than 200 ports depends on devel/boost.
I'd be OK if we rename b2 in this port to something else...
In debian they seem to rename the binary b2 -> backblaze-b2, according to:
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/all/backblaze-b2/filelist
So, maybe a lot of people don't depend on that name on their scripts...
Thoughts?
