On Sat 08/02/2025 07:56, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > On Wed 05/02/2025 20:49, Christoph Liebender wrote: > > Am 23.12.24 um 19:16 schrieb Bjorn Ketelaars: > > > On Mon 23/12/2024 14:28, Christoph Liebender wrote: > > > > I hate to be that guy, but: Ping! > > > > > > > > Is there anything else left for me to do? > > > > If not, what is the usual process for new additions to the ports tree, > > > > given > > > > that there are no amendments to be made? > > > > > > I think the port is in a good shape, and ready to be imported. Recycling > > > id 584 in infrastructure/db/user.list should cause no issue. I can > > > import this port after another OK. In case someone else wants to commit: > > > OK bket@ > > > > Hi again! > > Some time has passed, and in the meantime, wstunnel v10.1.9 just released. > > As I am using this personally I am definetly interested to have this port up > > to date, so here goes the incremental diff for wstunnel-10.1.9 with > > additionally an attached tarball. > > > > I think it would be very cool for wstunnel to appear in OpenBSD 7.7, since > > there are definetly some users out there that are interested in it being > > available on OpenBSD: https://github.com/erebe/wstunnel/issues/377 > > > > --- > > net/wstunnel/Makefile | 4 +- > > net/wstunnel/crates.inc | 133 ++++++++----- > > net/wstunnel/distinfo | 272 +++++++++++++++----------- > > net/wstunnel/patches/patch-Cargo_toml | 12 -- > > 4 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 net/wstunnel/patches/patch-Cargo_toml > > > > diff --git a/net/wstunnel/Makefile b/net/wstunnel/Makefile > > index 802e3827c8f0..586d9334183c 100644 > > --- a/net/wstunnel/Makefile > > +++ b/net/wstunnel/Makefile > > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > > COMMENT = tunnel all your traffic over Websocket or HTTP2 > > > > -DIST_TUPLE += github erebe wstunnel v10.1.8 . > > -DIST_TUPLE += github erebe fastwebsockets > > ef904598ec168d7748b28d77ec1803ba721932d8 fastwebsockets > > +DIST_TUPLE += github erebe wstunnel v10.1.9 . > > Patch is malformed and can't be applied, can you resend with correct > formatting?
Please ignore. You enclosed a tarball with your mail, which I only saw after finishing my coffee. Will report back after testing.
