Lydia Sobot <[email protected]> writes: > 2.9.6 attached, any committers please? > Any comments on the workaround?
I am OK to import it. Someone to do one more review ? Please see below regarding workaround. > On November 17, 2025 4:44:15 p.m. GMT+01:00, Lydia Sobot > <[email protected]> wrote: >>Ping ping, version 2.9.1 attached >> >>On November 4, 2025 7:45:46 p.m. GMT+01:00, Lydia Sobot >><[email protected]> wrote: >>>Ping, managed to write a workaround to make go test cooperate but I >>>don't think it is very pretty, suggestions on how to do it better more >>>than welcome, also bumped the version to 2.8.1 >>> >>>On Sun Oct 26, 2025 at 18:56 CET, Lydia Sobot wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Attached is a port of a new pager, moor (f.k.a. moar), tested on arm64. >>>> Source: https://github.com/walles/moor >>>> >>>> I'd greatly appreciate any help in getting go test to cooperate if >>>> necessary, I cannot for the life of me figure out why it isn't happy no >>>> matter what I do, even after adapting a patch in the FreeBSD port to >>>> internal/reader/reader_test.go (which made no apparent difference); I had no problem with running 'make test'. Did I miss something ? >>>> also >>>> upon inspection of the FreeBSD port, I noticed that they optionally >>>> include the sample files. Would this be appropriate for OpenBSD? There are useful for testing, but not really for installation. So I would be fine without them. >>>> Also, for the package categories, I looked at both what FreeBSD did, as >>>> well as prior art for similar ports on OpenBSD, but please feel free to >>>> edit them as appropriate. For me, sysutils is the right category. Having it in both textproc and sysutils is fine too. Regards. -- Sebastien Marie
