On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:34:38PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:05:20PM +0100, viq wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:56:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:10:45AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > > > > hmm, on Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Paul Irofti said that > > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:02:39PM +0200, Sergey Prysiazhnyi wrote: > > > > > > Any Subj in ports tree? Like centericq, etc? Thank you a lot for > > > > > > advise, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can always go with finch. Its the cli version from Pidgin. > > > > > > > > interesting. > > > > is it possible to make a finch flavour? > > > > > > > > > > > > hm, and it's not available for 4.1 as package (upgrade in planning) > > > > > > afaik it is. Debian do have finch as a separated package, so why not... > > > I've been thinking about this to. Maybe I'll look into it when I get > > > more free time on my hands. > > > > grep bin/finch /usr/ports/net/pidgin/pkg/PLIST > > bin/finch > > I don't understand what you're trying to say here. Of course finch is > in the PLIST, otherwise how would it get added to the binary package > that you install?
I could have misunderstood. I understood the previous statements as "I can't find finch, how can I get it". Or was "can we have a package just for finch, without the large dependency list of pidgin" meant? -- viq
