On Tue, 27 Oct 2026 13:17:23 +0100,
Martijn van Duren <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> -fpic doesn't fit for alpha, use -fPIC instead.
> Fix suggested by kirill@.
> 
> OK?
>

Not sure do you need a revision bump for this, but to stay on safe side I
suggested to add it.

Anyway, it builds fine on amd64 and passed make test

Also, make check-shlib-syms reports nothing.

So, OK kirill@

> martijn@
> 
> diff /usr/ports
> path + /usr/ports
> commit - 3eff4995526c542b34b298dfecc2ca0816223f67
> blob - 2c6c221eee18634e861bb33c67308308d2afcb8b
> file + security/rhash/patches/patch-configure
> --- security/rhash/patches/patch-configure
> +++ security/rhash/patches/patch-configure
> @@ -21,3 +21,12 @@ Index: configure
>   fi
>   
>   #####################################################################
> +@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ elif darwin; then
> +   LIBRHASH_SH_CFLAGS="-fpic"
> +   LIBRHASH_SH_LDFLAGS='-dynamiclib -Wl,-install_name,$(LIBDIR)/$@'
> + else
> +-  LIBRHASH_SH_CFLAGS="-fpic"
> ++  LIBRHASH_SH_CFLAGS="-fPIC"
> +   LIBRHASH_SH_LDFLAGS="-shared 
> -Wl${SHARED_VSCRIPT},-soname,\$(LIBRHASH_SO_MAJ)"
> +   test -n "$SHARED_VSCRIPT" && 
> LIBRHASH_EXPORTS_TARGET=$LIBRHASH_EXPORTS_FILE
> + fi
> 

-- 
wbr, Kirill

Reply via email to